Download
Did you know that every time you download music or videos from YouTube using unofficial tools, you are participating in potential copyright infringement? This behavior, which extends from music to videos to TV shows downloaded without the copyright owner's permission, not only violates the law but also seriously affects the revenue and creativity of artists. Known as “Stream ripping”, this practice of copying online content is not only popular in Vietnam but is also considered one of the biggest challenges facing the global entertainment industry. The negative impacts of online content piracy on artists and content creators can be severe and are often unpredictable.
What is the current situation of “Stream-Ripping” in Vietnam? What sanctions can be applied to copyright infringement, and what solutions can be implemented to improve the effectiveness of copyright protection? These questions will be answered by KENFOX IP & Law Office in this article.
In Vietnamese, “Stream ripping” can be referred to as “online content ripping” or “online content copying”.
“Stream-Ripping” refers to the process of using software or a web service to convert and download streaming media - such as music or videos - from sites like YouTube and Spotify, which typically offer content for temporary viewing or listening. Essentially, “Stream-Ripping” allows users to permanently save the streaming content to their devices, enabling offline access without proper licensing or permission from the copyright holders. This practice is often considered a form of copyright infringement, as it circumvents the copyright protections and licensing agreements that regulate content distribution and access.
The term “ripping” in a digital context refers to the process of extracting audio or video data from a CD, DVD, streaming media, or any digital media source, and converting it into a file format that can be stored, played, and managed on computers or other digital devices. Commonly, “ripping” is used to transfer content from physical media like CDs to a more convenient digital format, such as MP3 for audio or MP4 for video. This process allows users to easily access, organize, and transport their media on personal devices without needing the original physical medium.
Although “ripping” can be legally performed for personal use in some jurisdictions under fair use or private copying exemptions, it becomes illegal if the content is distributed without permission or violates copyright laws.
Vietnam has one of the highest levels of music piracy in the world, according to the latest 2023 Music Consumer Study conducted by the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI). The study shows that an alarming 66% of Vietnamese people aged 16 to 44 admit they regularly listen to pirated music - more than double the global average of 29%. The most common method is “Stream-Ripping”, with 63% of respondents admitting to downloading unlicensed music from sites such as YouTube via unauthorized websites and applications like Y2Mate and SnapTube. Additionally, 35% used cyberlockers like Mega or Rapidgator for music piracy (often to obtain pre-releaseleaks), and 29% frequented BitTorrent sites like ThePirateBay. Notably, Y2Mate, one of the most widely used tools, recorded over 53 million visits from Vietnam in 2023. These figures serve as a stark warning about the prevalence of music copyright infringement in Vietnam and underscore the urgent need for lawmakers and the music industry to address this issue.
Y2Mate, ranked among the top seven online content extraction websites globally, reportedly operates out of Vietnam and has drawn significant attention in the online community. Despite implementing voluntary geoblocking in the US, UK, France, and Germany to adhere to local copyright laws, the site remains accessible in these countries. Notably, operators have established alternative sites to circumvent these restrictions, undermining the effectiveness of digital content control measures and highlighting the challenges of enforcing intellectual property rights.
Acts of infringement of copyright and related rights are outlined in Articles 28 and 35 of the Intellectual Property Law 2022. Acts of copyright infringement can be categorized into three groups: (i) infringement of personal copyright rights; (ii) infringement of economic copyright rights; (iii) infringement of copyright protection measures.
According to current regulations, copyright owners can request that competent enforcement agencies apply administrative, civil, or criminal sanctions for acts of copyright infringement. The sanctions applied depend on the severity and nature of the infringement.
[1] Administrative sanctions: Such as fines, confiscation of counterfeit goods, and suspension of business operations. The level of fines depends on the type of violation committed by the organization or individual involved.
[2] Civil sanctions: Civil sanctions include measures such as ordering an end to the violations, awarding compensation for damages, and providing other remedies.
IP rights, especially copyright rights, are considered civil property rights, making compensation a key measure for addressing copyright infringements. However, due to the “intangible” nature of intellectual assets, the mechanisms for protection and violation management are distinct from those for tangible assets. The IP Law not only specifies legal mechanisms to enforce copyright protection but also aims to secure compensation for those whose rights have been infringed.
Intellectual property rights, particularly copyright rights, are considered civil property rights; thus, compensation is a key measure for addressing copyright infringement. However, due to the intangible nature of intellectual assets, the mechanisms for protection and violation handling exhibit unique characteristics compared to those for tangible assets. The IP Law not only establishes forms of liability to protect copyrights but also aims to recover damages for those whose rights have been infringed.
IP Law 2005, amended in 2009, 2019 and 2022
Civil Code 2015 and Civil Procedure Code 2015
[3] Criminal sanctions: Applicable in cases where acts of infringement of intellectual property rights are considered crimes under the Criminal Code.
The Intellectual Property Law stipulates: "Any individual, commercial legal entities who commits an act of infringement of intellectual property rights involving a criminal element shall be criminally prosecuted in accordance with the criminal law." (Article 212 of the Intellectual Property Law).
In addition, Article 225 of the 2015 Penal Code also stipulates the crime of infringing upon copyright and related rights. Specifically:
Other criminal sanctions
In the context of globalization and the rapid development of digital technology, copyright protection has become more urgent than ever. This is particularly true in Vietnam, where acts of copyright infringement are not only becoming more common but also more sophisticated. It is essential to recognize that protecting copyrights is not just about safeguarding creators but also about contributing to the cultural and economic development of the country. A respected and strictly adhered-to legal system will motivate creativity and innovation, bringing widespread benefits to society as a whole.
To protect the rights of creators and authors, intellectual property rights holders and enforcement agencies in Vietnam must develop a comprehensive strategy that integrates legal, technological, and educational approaches. Namely:
Vietnam has made significant strides in protecting IPRs since joining the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT), also known as the WIPO Internet Treaty, in 2022. Along with extensive reforms to its IP Law that same year, these developments demonstrate the Vietnamese government's ongoing commitment to strengthening copyright protection. However, combating piracy remains a never-ending battle in most jurisdictions around the world. Infringers, employing increasingly sophisticated tactics and technology, continue to test the boundaries of the law, eluding enforcement agencies and rights holders. Obviously, this requires continuous, synchronized efforts and a comprehensive strategy to effectively restrain, prevent and handle copyright infringement in the digital environment in Vietnam.
KENFOX IP & Law Office, with extensive practical experience and expertise, has been successfully supporting many IP rights holders in handling and enforcing IP rights. Please contact us if you need a professional IP representative to effectively handle IP infringements in Vietnam.
By Nguyen Vu QUAN
Partner & IP Attorney
Related Articles:
