Download
Protecting intellectual property rights (IPR) involves the use of legal measures by state agencies and IPR holders to protect the ownership of their IP objects, prevent any infringement to ensure the integrity of these assets. Protecting IPRs entails not only preventing actual acts of infringement but also addressing and resolving infringements in order to cease the infringement and seek compensation for damages incurred.
What legal measures can be applied to address IP infringement? In which cases must "criminal" measures be applied rather than "administrative" ones? Can both measures be simultaneously applied to handle an IP infringement? KENFOX IP & Law Office provides detailed answers to these questions to equip IPR holders with the necessary knowledge and strategies to effectively protect and enforce IPRs in Vietnam in accordance with the law.
Measures for protecting and enforcing IPRs
To enhance flexibility in protecting and enforcing IPR, the IP Law stipulates various measures to protect IPR. These protective measures can be divided into two types based on the "subjects" carrying out acts of protecting IPRs:
Self-protection measures for IPRs are actions taken by the IPR holders themselves, as stipulated in Article 198 of the Intellectual Property Law. This is the measure that best demonstrates the self-determination by subjects in legal relationships, allowing them to proactively protect their rights without depending on any legal procedures. The law grants IPR holders (owners of IPRs or organizations or individuals to whom IPRs have been transferred) the right to self-protect against infringements.
Article 198 of the Intellectual Property Law stipulates the right of IPR holders to apply the following measures to self-protection of their IP rights:
Overview of civil measures: Civil measures can be applied to address acts of IPR infringement at the request of the rights holder or individuals or organizations harmed by such acts. Civil remedies may be utilized even if the infringement has been or is being handled through administrative or criminal measures. Procedures for requesting the application of civil remedies, as well as relevant jurisdiction and processes, are governed by the provisions of civil legal proceedings.
Civil sanctions: These includes measures such as requiring the cessation of infringing acts, compensation for damages, or other remedies.
IPRs in general, and copyright rights in particular, are civil property rights, so compensation for damages is one of the measures to handle copyright infringements. However, due to the intangible nature of intellectual property assets, the mechanism for protecting and handling violations has unique characteristics distinct from tangible assets. The IP Law not only defines the forms of legal liability to protect copyright but also aims to recover damages suffered by the rights holders.
Overview of administrative measures: Administrative measures are applied to address acts of IP infringement when falling under the cases specified in Article 211 of the Intellectual Property Law. The application of administrative measures can be carried out at the request of the rights holder, the individual or organization that suffers damages, the individual or organization that detects the infringement, or by a competent authority proactively detect the infringement.
Administrative sanctions: Forms, fines, authorities, procedures for sanctioning infringements and remedial measures comply with the provisions of the Intellectual Property Law and the law on sanctioning administrative violations in the field of copyright and related rights, industrial property rights and plant variety rights. The administrative measures are applied to acts of infringement but not to the extent of requiring criminal prosecution. These measures arre implemented by the police, market management, inspectors, customs and people's committees at competent levels.
Sanctions often applied to acts of IP infringement by administrative measures include Fines, confiscation of counterfeit goods, and temporary suspension of business activities.
The level of fines for administrative violations in the field of copyright depends on the type of infringement committed by the organization or individual.
Overview of criminal measures: Criminal measures are applied to protect IPRs, specified in Article 212, aiming to handle acts of IPR infringement that are considered crimes under the Criminal Code. The objective of criminal measures is to prosecute criminal liability for acts that constitute crimes, with the authority, procedures and processes in compliance with criminal procedural law. Individuals and commercial legal entities committing IP infringement that meet the elements of a crime are subject to criminal liability. The 2015 Criminal Code, amended in 2017, has provided an increase in the level of severity in handling IP violations,
thereby protecting the rights and interests of authors and owners. Specifically, the law defines two crimes: Infringement of copyright and related rights (Article 225) and Infringement of industrial property rights (Article 226).
Criminal sanctions: Applicable in cases where acts of IPR infringement are considered crimes under the Criminal Code.
The Intellectual Property Law stipulates: "Individuals and commercial legal entities committing acts infringing upon IPR that constitute a crime shall be subject to criminal liability." (Article 212 of the Intellectual Property Law).
Criminal sanctions apply to four categories of intellectual property, including:
Crime of infringing copyright and related rights: Criminal sanctions for acts infringing upon copyright and related rights are prescribed in Article 225 of the 2015 Criminal Code as follows:
Other criminal sanctions
Crime of infringement of industrial property rights: Criminal sanctions for acts infringing IPRs (including: infringement of trademarks rights (trademark counterfeit goods) or GIs (GI counterfeit goods) currently protected in Vietnam are stipulated in Article 226 of the 2015 Criminal Code as follows:
KENFOX IP & Law Office, with extensive practical experience and expertise, has been successfully supporting many IPR holders in handling and enforcing their IPRs. Please contact us if you need a professional IP representative to effectively handle IP infringements in Vietnam.
By Nguyen Vu QUAN
Partner & IP Attorney
Related Articles: